Children Hurting from Parental Seperation and Divorce Essay

Marriage has always been, and remains, one of Canadas most important social structures. Yet more and more marriages are ending in divorce. Canadas divorce rate is currently about fifty percent. Half of all children will witness the break up of their parents marriage. Of these children, another half will witness the break up of a parents second marriage, as well. (Furstenberg, Nord). As a family, divorce is a difficult matter to deal with, but divorce always takes the largest toll on the children involved. ?Many studies have shown that the children of divorce are anywhere from two to three times more likely to end up with serious, long-term damage. Problems like addiction, delinquency, school failure and mental illness are common†¦show more content†¦Children of divorce often suffer from negative psychological effects such as changes of views on marriage, a sense of lost hope for their family and thinking that they have been abandoned and forgotten. Children learn from experi ence. If a child grows up in a home with two parents who love each other, and who show marriage in a positive light the child will perceive marriage as a positive thing. However, if a child is raised in a home with two parents who fight and eventually decide to end their marriage, the child will think, ?why get married in the first place Lloyd Moody, a child of divorce, proves this theory very true. ?I see now that relationships are not meant to last, if my parents after twenty-one, apparently happy years, can?t make it, who can? I am not expecting to get into a relationship and have it last forever.? (Lloyd Moody). This is the way that Lloyd feels a relationship would work out for him in the future, and with good reason. E. Mavis Heatherington indicates that children of divorced parents had roughly double the divorce rate of those from stable families, due in part to a lower commitment to marital permanence and fewer relationship skills. (Third Thoughts on Divorce). Children of div orce see the pain that their parents feel and often decide early on not to get married. They may also think about the children that they may possibly have in the future and how much pain it could cause them if the marriage were to end in divorce.

An Individual s Moral Conscience - 1439 Words

Majority of man’s belief creates laws to govern and protect the people, but an individual’s own belief can do just as much while staying true to justice. In the play Antigone by Sophocles, shows the conflation of both an individual and majority’s moral conscience through the rightness of justice. The citizens of Thebes seek justice for their past king, but others respect the law and deny his burial. As time forwards there are changes, the law is at a standstill and can only change if the majority chooses to do so. An individual’s moral conscience changes and develops the moment that an individual is born, so the justice they strive for is more modern and thoughtful. The characters from Antigone try to achieve justice by their own belief or by the law and in result true justice becomes far from reach. As a king, Creon guides and conducts his people by the law in order to protect, he would throw human morals away for the greater good. As a single individua l, Antigone thinks by her own belief and creates her own form of justice. The more they progress towards their justice, the conflict between each other starts to form because of how their justice diverges from basic justice. For Creon and Antigone, their justice cannot coincide with each other due to human morals and relationships will not change this fact. The characters must either fight for the justice they believe in or give up on trying to do so. Sophocles illustrate that man must go against governmental law in orderShow MoreRelatedWhat Makes A Conscience?1171 Words   |  5 Pageswrong. One’s conscience is developed over a lifetime and is influenced by environment, loved ones and social interactions. One’s conscience does not force actions; it merely serves to attempts to fulfill and justify one’s ethics, judgment, and actions. Many people bury their conscience beneath false justification and a lack of integrity, resulting in an absence of morals and tru th. A conscience is often a negotiable part of the human mind and strong-minded and determined individuals may be able toRead MoreThe Need For Civil Disobedience Essay1172 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Cowardice asks the question, Is it safe? Expediency asks the question, Is it politic? But conscience asks the question, Is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right.† Conscience is the main sense of human being that helps to distinguish what is wrong and what is right. Thus, conscience has to be a main driving force when people encounter unjust laws of government. One of the philosophersRead MoreMartin Luther King Jr And Henry David Thoreau1393 Words   |  6 Pagesleast had some part in our stride for equality in the United States. Whether it be in the Transcendentalist Era of the early 19th century in which Thoreau composed one of the most prominent documents of hi s time â€Å"Civil Disobedience†, or during the 1960’s fight for racial equality in which Dr. King wrote his powerful â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail†, both seeked to better the ways in which the government was wrongfully treating its’ citizens. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was greatly influenced by Henry DavidRead MoreMoral Discernment By Father Richard Gula1458 Words   |  6 PagesWhen reading the first fifty-three pages of Moral Discernment by Father Richard Gula, I really became to understand his views of morality and how it is not a matter of creating a list of rules, but it involves more in the development of being a fully human being. In the first section of the book labeled conscience, he talks about Freud’s psychological view of the ego, id, and superego. The id controls our unconscious pleasure and drives. Ego operates on the reality and tries to balance of both realityRead MoreDr. Faustus As Morality Play1443 Words   |  6 Pagestrage dy, two aspects must be considered. Firstly, it must be decided whether Dr. Faustus is a morality play or not. In an attempt to categorize the play, the play s form, content and subject matter will be discussed. There is alternative argument that states the play is in fact a tragedy. Secondly, does this supposed morality play have a moral? In order to answer this question, the tone of certain parts of the play will be analyzed. To determine if Dr. Faustus is a morality play or not, one must firstRead MoreMurder Is The Most Inhumane Thing938 Words   |  4 PagesOklahoma State bombing. While these three serial killers had different methods for their acts, the one thing they have in common is that they are killers. Perhaps to not the same extent, but sadly enough the world is full of Charles Manson s and Ted Bundy s. Violence has become a common and prevalent occurrence in society today. Every day on the news one hears stories of crimes-murder, robbery, rape, assault, extortion, kidnapping, homicide, an endless list. Law enforcement works day and nightRead MoreThe Collision of Ones Conscience and Human Law 1113 Words   |  4 PagesThe collision of ones conscience and human law is inevitable. Human law is a law generated and made by man. These laws contribute to how society functions and how society is controlled legally. Human law is more familiar to us because our ways of thinking have lived, grown and developed in a society where conforming to human law is practiced by majority. The interference of ones conscience and human law creates an ongoing debate of whether the law or personal morals should come first when a conflictRead MoreThe Ethics Of The Bioethics1094 Words   |  5 Pageshealt hcare institutions, life technology, and medicine. For this week s assignment, I will conduct independent research for current bioethical issues. I will provide three examples of current, bioethical issues and explain the surrounding ethical issues. As well as discuss the importance of the conscience clause. And whether healthcare workers and facilities should have the ability to refuse to perform certain procedures based on moral or religious objections? Read MorePunishment Essay1120 Words   |  5 Pagesare many explanations for what punishment characterises. For Emile Durkheim, punishment was mainly an expression of social solidarity and not a form of crime control. Here, the offender attacks the social moral order by committing a crime and therefore, has to be punished, to show that this moral order still quot;worksquot;. Durkheims theory suggests that punishment must be visible to everyone, and so expresses the outrage of all members of society against the challenge to their collective valuesRead MoreThe Issue Of Abortion And Abortion876 Words   |  4 Pagesregardless of concerns for the pregnant woman’s health, or for the quality of the life of the child. The Pro-Choice argument feels that a woman should have the choice when it comes to what they wish to do with their own reproductive organs. There s many arguments regarding abortions. One of many is that adoption is a viable alternative to abortion. This statement implies that the only reason a woman would want to get an abortion is to avoid raising a child, and that isn’t the case. Depending on

Industrial Organizational Economics-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss how does the definition of market play a vital role in Oracle- PeopleSoft versus DOJ case. Answer: Introduction The conceptual and theoretical framework of economics has changed and incorporated different modification over the years, with the changing global economic scenarios. One of the primary conceptual framework in economics, especially in Microeconomics is the concept of market. In terms of economics, market is defined as the forum where the supply side and the demand side players of any industry interact with each other to come to a mutually agreed situation in terms of the amount of goods and services produced and sold as well as in terms of price (Baumol and Blinder 2015). In economics, the markets are classified into several types depending upon attributes like the number of buyers and sellers in the market, the level of market power enjoyed by the buyers and sellers, the nature of the commodity or service the market deals with, ease of entry and exit from the market as well as the level of competition existing in the market. The nature of market holds considerable significance on the operational framework of the firms as well as on the welfare of the demand and the supply side players and thus for any firm to take any productive action it is of utmost importance for the firm to be clear about the nature of market in which it is venturing (Frank and Cartwright 2013). Keeping this into consideration, the report tries to highlight the importance of the definition of market in the real economic scenario, with reference to the Oracle-Peoplesoft antitrust case as is discussed in the article named Oracle wins antitrust case (Cnet.com 2018). Article Summary As can be seen from the concerned article one of the giants in the enterprise software market, the Oracle had to face a bar from taking over its competitor, the Peoplesoft, from the Department of Justice primarily because of the threat of decrease in competition in the industry which the DoJ perceived to be occurring following the takeover of the Peoplesoft by the Oracle. The Department of Justice defined the market in which these companies venture to be already narrow due to the presence of three big players, namely the Oracle, SAP and Peoplesoft. Given this situation, the takeover is expected to narrow down the market even more, according to the DoJ, thereby hampering the competitive aspects which can have negative effects on the consumers. However, the bar put on the takeover has been nullified by the District Judge who did not find the strategy to be anti-competitive and rejected the idea of narrow market put forward by the DoJ. The main reason behind the victory of Oracle in their takeover decision can be attributed to the lack of substantial customer apprehensions regarding the takeover and also to the argument put forward by Oracle. In their support Oracle brought forward the notion that their decision of taking over Peoplesoft would still keep them below SAP in terms of market share and size of the companies (Theregister.co.uk, 2018). However, as their perceptions go, the merger will make them competitive and capable enough to give tougher competition to SAP. This argument contradicts the idea of narrow market of the DoJ, thereby supporting the takeover decision of the Oracle. The final verdict is however still not out as the company is still about to face an investigation by the European Union (Singh 2013). Keeping these incidents and arguments into consideration the report tries to analyse the importance of the definition of the market, in the sense of economics and also the difference of perceptions of competition in the market on the decision-making aspects of the firms as well as on the regulatory impositions and legal aspects considered by the governing authorities regarding the allowance or restriction of the business decisions of the firms. Importance of the definition of market in real economic scenario As can be seen to be evident from the assertions of the article taken into consideration, the strategic decision taken by Oracle, for taking over their competitor Peoplesoft led to the creation of a debate regarding the expected changes in the dynamics in the market which the potential takeover can bring, which in turn may have considerable impacts on the welfare of the supply side players as well as of the customers in the market (Kagel and Roth 2016). The primary reason behind this debate can be attributed to the differences in the perceptions and definitions of the concerned market and its dynamics put forward by the two conflicting parties which are discussed as follows: a) Argument put forward by DoJ- The DoJ barred the takeover decision of the Oracle siting that the same would lead to a narrower market. According to their assertions, the already oligopolistic market (Comprising of three major players), post the potential takeover has the threat of becoming a duopoly market, which in turn is expected to distort the market power distribution even more, thereby brining in anti-competitive forces and hampering the welfare of the customers (Feng, Li and Li 2014). This is primarily because in the presence of two big duopolistic producers, each with huge price and output decision making power, the customers are expected to have less bargaining power. b) Argument put forward by Oracle- The victory of the Oracle however, can be attributed to the nullification of the definition of the narrow market put forward by the DoJ, by the District Judge. This is because, according to the alternative view, of the three big players, SAP enjoys bigger share of market and market power than both Oracle and Peoplesoft and is a considerably bigger company than the other two taken together (Weston 2016). In such a situation, if Oracle takes over Peoplesoft, then there is a possibility of an increase in the combined market power in the hands of Oracle, which in turn can help them to pose bigger competitive threats for SAP, thereby reducing its dominance and actually making the market more competitive. Conclusion From the above discussion, it can be asserted that the definition of market and the perception of its dynamics have considerable implications not only the business decisions of the companies but also on the regulations and restrictions imposed on them. The perceptions of market also vary from individual to individual and this in turn often gives rise to substantial debate in the real economic situations, as is evident from the recent antitrust issue faced by Oracle in their decision of taking over Peoplesoft. References Baumol, W.J. and Blinder, A.S., 2015.Microeconomics: Principles and policy. Cengage Learning. Cnet.com (2018).Oracle wins antitrust case. [online] CNET. Available at: https://www.cnet.com/news/oracle-wins-antitrust-case/ [Accessed 8 Apr. 2018]. Feng, Y., Li, B. and Li, B., 2014. Price competition in an oligopoly market with multiple iaas cloud providers.IEEE Transactions on Computers,63(1), pp.59-73. Frank, R. and Cartwright, E., 2013.Microeconomics and behaviour. McGraw Hill. Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. eds., 2016.The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2: The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton university press. Singh, N.P., 2013. Critical analysis of expansion strategies of SAP, IBM, Oracle and Microsoft in the area of business intelligence. InStrategic Adoption of Technological Innovations(pp. 104-125). IGI Global. Theregister.co.uk (2018).Oracle wins US antitrust suit. [online] Theregister.co.uk. Available at: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/10/oracle_wins_us_antitrust/ [Accessed 8 Apr. 2018]. Weston, S., 2016.The Legal regulation of interoperability in an oligopolistic market(Doctoral dissertation, Bournemouth University)